Unconvinced by Nova Swing, a friend asks me, “Are you happier than before, or something ?” The Course of the Heart, she says, scared her stiff. “This book doesn’t scare me at all.”
I answer that I don’t think it’s happiness. But I’m definitely less angry than I was. “Also,” I remind her, “The Course of the Heart was supposed to scare you to death, which Nova Swing isn’t.” Then I read this journal entry from 1990, when I was finishing The Course of the Heart, & realise I’m neither the 45 year old who wrote it, nor the 20 year old being described–
Driving to Oxford I glimpsed a single figure on the hard shoulder of the motorway, silhouetted at the top of a long rise against the grey sky full of distance. All that had happened was that his car had broken down half an hour before, & now he was walking back to it from the AA phone box. But the weather was bad, & in the right circumstances a figure like this, hunched up, hands in pockets, can quickly take on an air less of temporary defeat or dejection as of acceptance. He looked displaced. It’s too easy for me to construct such figures–whose nerves aren’t actually anaesthetised, whose affect is not yet numbed, who are still alive although, just for now, in a reduced way. The personal landscape they inhabit, that of being forever between events, is one of my favourites. When I was twenty I tried to occupy it permanently. I honoured all tramps, refugees, losers, & displaced persons you might meet and subsequently adopt in 1966 in the warmth of the all-night launderette, Holloway.
I’ve been at least one other person since then, but he’s gone too, along with his shadowy others.
Sorry to disappoint. Course of the Heart did not scare me, though I loved it. NovaSwing did scare me a lot: about who we are, and where we are going, and I was damned relieved to finish it and close it and never look at it again. But I would certainly go back and read Course of the Heart again. I loved it.
Different kind of scaring to death, I think…
I gave Course of the Heart to someone recently, who was astonished by it. Before I passed it on, though, I re-read it for the first time in about 5 years. Like all great books, it’s shifted and grown when you’re not looking: the scenes seem lit differently, Lawson’s incest is more grotesque , “Beautiful Swimmers” far more finessed than I remember. But it’s as sad as ever. It’s less the big effects like the White Couple that stick in the mind than the utensils scattered across Pam’s kitchen floor or the scent of old flowers trapped in a book. To cop the title of this thread, the finale is as moving and evanescent as the end of “Visions of Johanna” – all those small things go to outline a complete and utter void.
Hi Mike,
I reread The Course of the Heart last August. It scared me, again.
Best wishes,
Caroline
Hi Caroline. I’m glad. How’s things going ?
Martin: so many of the events of my life are trapped in these books that I now try not to revisit them…
I would like to see what chaos Chaplin’s Tramp would make of a laundromat, with satiny bras and stained underoos all over the place and whatnot.
Will there be more neon hearts?
Hi Mike,
I’m fine thank you very much. Working at a ‘leading’ (at least that’s what is printed on the masthead) religious weekly newspaper at the moment…
I saw Zali and Mark at a party this weekend… are you planning another performance with them (that would be good)?
So glad you are blogging again.
Caroline
Good to hear you’ve got religion at last, Caroline. Not before time.
On performing with Z&M: we plan to do more, but I’m a bit busy at the moment trying to make this book be a book.